Update (14-May-2011): HazeNet has been taken over by ThrustVPS / Rus Foster. Read more about it here
This benchmark is #2 in the series from HazNet, the previous one was done on their Core2Quad series and this one is on their latest XEON nodes.
Unix Benchmark results from HazNet using unixbench v 5.1.2. HazeNet offers 4 cores on their 1024 and 2048 packages.
Specs: 1024MB OpenVZ running Ubuntu 10.04 LTS 32bit
Unix Benchmark results from DirectSpace using unixbench v 5.1.2. This is one of their $2/mo offers as advertised in this WebHostingTalk thread
Specs: 512MB OpenVZ running Ubuntu 10.04 LTS 32bit
Unix Benchmark results from VPSLatch (OpenVZ running Ubuntu 10.04 LTS 32bit on their Orlando, FL node) using unixbench v 5.1.2
Specs: 1024MB / 60GB OpenVZ running Ubuntu 10.04 LTS 32bit
Note: This VPS has the best benchmark that I have ever seen, wow, no doubt Adam is having busy managing the best VPS+CPanel combination ever!
I signed up with ThrustVPS on Jul 27, 2010. Sounded like a good company although I read a lot of bad review about Rus Foster who is now leading this new venture previously known as DamnVPS. There were lots of issues in the start and not to mention so many down times that went unaccounted for.
Update (April 23, 2011): I have updated the download urls to point to new servers
A little while ago (approx 2 weeks) I read a story online which claimed a person has downloaded a compiled 100m Facebook users’ personal data. I searched online and found this torrent on thepiratebay.org
I downloaded this torrent and to my surprise, its almost NOTHING personal. Just names and Facebook IDs. Anyway, I also found a BBC Story on the same topic which is pathetic! They sounded this as if Facebook is HACKED, which is not the case.
Anyway, anyone who does not want to download via other file-sharing services or torrents can download this from the following VPS locations
P.S. If, for some reasons, you cannot download this file, leave a comment with a valid email address in this post and I will get back to you with the valid link.
Update (26-Aug-2010): From my experience, they have very huge iowait and hence I/O problems on their VPS servers. You have to wait for like 10-15 seconds for a ‘uptime’ command to execute which is pretty pathetic. So in my opinion, it was useless for me.
Unix Benchmark results from Spacerich (OpenVZ running Ubuntu 10.04 LTS 32bit on their Munich, Germany node) using unixbench v 5.1.2
Specs: 256MB / 25GB OpenVZ running Ubuntu 10.04 LTS 32bit
Note: Being in Europe, it has the best response time to Asia especially Pakistan
Update (25-Aug-2010): Rus Foster from ThrustVPS.com is a blackmailer and a person with low self-esteem. He actually blackmailed me to hand him over certain domain names which he
thinksbelieves is breaching the AUP. My accounts, VPS and the $60 of affiliate commission was terminated. I will advise everyone to KEEP AWAY from Rus Foster and ThrustVPS.com (click here to read the full review)
Unix Benchmark results from ThrustVPS (XEN HVM running Ubuntu 10.04 LTS on their West Coast (LA) node) using unixbench v 5.1.2
Specs: 512MB / 15GB XEN HVM running Ubuntu 10.04 LTS 32bit
Note: Although the test results from the previous bechmark on their XEN PV is just average, this one is the best benchmark I had on a 512MB VPS ever!
Alert: (05-Sep-2010) RackVM is/was a shady business and Ben, owner of RackVM, has run away with hundreds of client’s payments. As of today, all of their nodes are down. Ben just tricked everyone to his per annum offers and ran away with cash in hand. Unfortunately, I was also one of these victims.
Unix Benchmark results from RackVM using unixbench v 5.1.2
Specs: 128MB / 10GB XEN PV running Ubuntu 10.04 LTS
The most amazing part? well, I got this VPS for just 6pounds bi-annually (6 months), thats 1 pound per month 
Note: Although their servers are Core2Quad, I have access to 4 cores and the benchmark results (as compared with my QuickWeb 128MB XEN PV) are very good
Life is really moving in the fast lane for me, and Im pretty sure for most of you readers too. I login to social-networking platforms after weeks and I cant recognize most of these faces (even though they are my friends). Its proven that Humans tend to recognize people by face more quickly then names and email addresses so whenever someone puts on a new face (uploads a new profile-picture), I have hard time getting to know them.
Well, I thought today, I have been developing in facebook application for so long now – Why not put online a few hours to fetch Facebook Friends data via API and keeping track of who did what? (status updates) and who changed his/her profile picture? So last night I was up, as usual, and I put together a small script in PHP that fetches my friends’s list, processes newcomers, checks for updates (pictures and statuses) and posts them into a database. Now I can track who updated his profile picture and what was their previous profile photo. Also, I can invest in another 1 hr to create high-level-summary everyday for ME
Do you do something of this sort? I’d love to hear your story
Update (25-Aug-2010): Rus Foster from ThrustVPS.com is a blackmailer and a person with low self-esteem. He actually blackmailed me to hand him over certain domain names which he
thinksbelieves is breaching the AUP. My accounts, VPS and the $60 of affiliate commission was terminated. I will advise everyone to KEEP AWAY from Rus Foster and ThrustVPS.com (click here to read the full review)
Unix Benchmark results from ThrustVPS using unixbench v 5.1.2
Specs: 512MB / 15GB XEN PV running Ubuntu 10.04 LTS
# # # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # #
# # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # #
# # # # # # ## ##### ##### # # # # ######
# # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # #
# # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # #
#### # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # #
Version 5.1.2 Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark
Multi-CPU version Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith,
Sunnyvale, CA, USA
December 22, 2007 johantheghost at yahoo period com
1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Process Creation 1 2 3
1 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3
1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3
========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2)
System: wc.li-node.com: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.32-306-ec2 -- #11-Ubuntu SMP Tue Jun 1 14:35:25 UTC 2010
Machine: x86_64 (unknown)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz (4791.1 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
18:19:22 up 3:09, 1 user, load average: 0.26, 0.26, 0.32; runlevel 2
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Wed Jul 28 2010 18:19:22 - 18:47:38
1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 26329137.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 3042.7 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 1574.9 lps (29.7 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 231428.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 59019.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 719938.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 365359.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 89788.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 3490.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 3024.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 396.9 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 429628.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 26329137.2 2256.1
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3042.7 553.2
Execl Throughput 43.0 1574.9 366.3
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 231428.5 584.4
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 59019.0 356.6
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 719938.8 1241.3
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 365359.6 293.7
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 89788.9 224.5
Process Creation 126.0 3490.3 277.0
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 3024.7 713.4
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 396.9 661.5
System Call Overhead 15000.0 429628.4 286.4
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 507.5
root@wc:~/unixbench-5.1.2#