<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NordicVPS Benchmark</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.asim.pk/2010/07/23/nordicvps-benchmark/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.asim.pk/2010/07/23/nordicvps-benchmark/</link>
	<description>Technology Bytes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 20:29:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Remy</title>
		<link>http://www.asim.pk/2010/07/23/nordicvps-benchmark/comment-page-1/#comment-1062</link>
		<dc:creator>Remy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Sep 2010 15:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asim.pk/?p=716#comment-1062</guid>
		<description>the LEB openzv 15$/year unixbench: 
 
 
   #    #  #    #  #  #    #          #####   ######  #    #   ####   #    # 
   #    #  ##   #  #   #  #           #    #  #       ##   #  #    #  #    # 
   #    #  # #  #  #    ##            #####   #####   # #  #  #       ###### 
   #    #  #  # #  #    ##            #    #  #       #  # #  #       #    # 
   #    #  #   ##  #   #  #           #    #  #       #   ##  #    #  #    # 
    ####   #    #  #  #    #          #####   ######  #    #   ####   #    # 
 
   Version 5.1.2                      Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark 
 
   Multi-CPU version                  Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith, 
                                      Sunnyvale, CA, USA 
   December 22, 2007                  johantheghost at yahoo period com 
 
 
1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 
 
1 x Double-Precision Whetstone  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 
 
1 x Execl Throughput  1 2 3 
 
1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks  1 2 3 
 
1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks  1 2 3 
 
1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks  1 2 3 
 
1 x Pipe Throughput  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 
 
1 x Pipe-based Context Switching  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 
 
1 x Process Creation  1 2 3 
 
1 x System Call Overhead  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 
 
1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)  1 2 3 
 
1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)  1 2 3 
 
======================================================================== 
   BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2) 
 
   System: vps: GNU/Linux 
   OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.18-194.8.1.el5.028stab070.5 -- #1 SMP Fri Sep 17 19:10:36 MSD 2010 
   Machine: i686 (unknown) 
   Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap=&quot;ANSI_X3.4-1968&quot;, collate=&quot;ANSI_X3.4-1968&quot;) 
   CPU 0: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 930 @ 2.80GHz (5614.1 bogomips) 
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization 
   13:39:12 up 12:40,  1 user,  load average: 0.07, 0.02, 0.00; runlevel  
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
Benchmark Run: Sat Sep 25 2010 13:39:12 - 14:08:46 
1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests 
 
Dhrystone 2 using register variables       12858743.6 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples) 
Double-Precision Whetstone                     2628.9 MWIPS (7.2 s, 7 samples) 
Execl Throughput                               3706.3 lps   (29.9 s, 2 samples) 
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        494046.1 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples) 
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          184388.1 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples) 
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       1387170.2 KBps  (30.1 s, 2 samples) 
Pipe Throughput                              963897.6 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples) 
Pipe-based Context Switching                 326563.2 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples) 
Process Creation                              11982.6 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples) 
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   8581.6 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples) 
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   1128.9 lpm   (60.1 s, 2 samples) 
System Call Overhead                         894919.5 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples) 
 
System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX 
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   12858743.6   1101.9 
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       2628.9    478.0 
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       3706.3    861.9 
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     494046.1   1247.6 
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     184388.1   1114.1 
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    1387170.2   2391.7 
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0     963897.6    774.8 
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     326563.2    816.4 
Process Creation                                126.0      11982.6    951.0 
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       8581.6   2024.0 
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       1128.9   1881.5 
System Call Overhead                          15000.0     894919.5    596.6 
                                                                   ======== 
System Benchmarks Index Score                                        1062.2 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the LEB openzv 15$/year unixbench:</p>
<p>   #    #  #    #  #  #    #          #####   ######  #    #   ####   #    #</p>
<p>   #    #  ##   #  #   #  #           #    #  #       ##   #  #    #  #    #</p>
<p>   #    #  # #  #  #    ##            #####   #####   # #  #  #       ######</p>
<p>   #    #  #  # #  #    ##            #    #  #       #  # #  #       #    #</p>
<p>   #    #  #   ##  #   #  #           #    #  #       #   ##  #    #  #    #</p>
<p>    ####   #    #  #  #    #          #####   ######  #    #   ####   #    #</p>
<p>   Version 5.1.2                      Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark</p>
<p>   Multi-CPU version                  Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith,</p>
<p>                                      Sunnyvale, CA, USA</p>
<p>   December 22, 2007                  johantheghost at yahoo period com</p>
<p>1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10</p>
<p>1 x Double-Precision Whetstone  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10</p>
<p>1 x Execl Throughput  1 2 3</p>
<p>1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks  1 2 3</p>
<p>1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks  1 2 3</p>
<p>1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks  1 2 3</p>
<p>1 x Pipe Throughput  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10</p>
<p>1 x Pipe-based Context Switching  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10</p>
<p>1 x Process Creation  1 2 3</p>
<p>1 x System Call Overhead  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10</p>
<p>1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)  1 2 3</p>
<p>1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)  1 2 3</p>
<p>========================================================================</p>
<p>   BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2)</p>
<p>   System: vps: GNU/Linux</p>
<p>   OS: GNU/Linux &#8212; 2.6.18-194.8.1.el5.028stab070.5 &#8212; #1 SMP Fri Sep 17 19:10:36 MSD 2010</p>
<p>   Machine: i686 (unknown)</p>
<p>   Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap=&quot;ANSI_X3.4-1968&quot;, collate=&quot;ANSI_X3.4-1968&quot;)</p>
<p>   CPU 0: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 930 @ 2.80GHz (5614.1 bogomips)</p>
<p>          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization</p>
<p>   13:39:12 up 12:40,  1 user,  load average: 0.07, 0.02, 0.00; runlevel </p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>Benchmark Run: Sat Sep 25 2010 13:39:12 &#8211; 14:08:46</p>
<p>1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests</p>
<p>Dhrystone 2 using register variables       12858743.6 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)</p>
<p>Double-Precision Whetstone                     2628.9 MWIPS (7.2 s, 7 samples)</p>
<p>Execl Throughput                               3706.3 lps   (29.9 s, 2 samples)</p>
<p>File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        494046.1 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)</p>
<p>File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          184388.1 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)</p>
<p>File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       1387170.2 KBps  (30.1 s, 2 samples)</p>
<p>Pipe Throughput                              963897.6 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)</p>
<p>Pipe-based Context Switching                 326563.2 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)</p>
<p>Process Creation                              11982.6 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)</p>
<p>Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   8581.6 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)</p>
<p>Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   1128.9 lpm   (60.1 s, 2 samples)</p>
<p>System Call Overhead                         894919.5 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)</p>
<p>System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX</p>
<p>Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   12858743.6   1101.9</p>
<p>Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       2628.9    478.0</p>
<p>Execl Throughput                                 43.0       3706.3    861.9</p>
<p>File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     494046.1   1247.6</p>
<p>File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     184388.1   1114.1</p>
<p>File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    1387170.2   2391.7</p>
<p>Pipe Throughput                               12440.0     963897.6    774.8</p>
<p>Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     326563.2    816.4</p>
<p>Process Creation                                126.0      11982.6    951.0</p>
<p>Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       8581.6   2024.0</p>
<p>Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       1128.9   1881.5</p>
<p>System Call Overhead                          15000.0     894919.5    596.6</p>
<p>                                                                   ========</p>
<p>System Benchmarks Index Score                                        1062.2</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Asim Zeeshan</title>
		<link>http://www.asim.pk/2010/07/23/nordicvps-benchmark/comment-page-1/#comment-902</link>
		<dc:creator>Asim Zeeshan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 22:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asim.pk/?p=716#comment-902</guid>
		<description>Cool! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bekanosky</title>
		<link>http://www.asim.pk/2010/07/23/nordicvps-benchmark/comment-page-1/#comment-883</link>
		<dc:creator>bekanosky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 21:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asim.pk/?p=716#comment-883</guid>
		<description>Btw, i&#039;m using their debian and happy so far. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Btw, i&#039;m using their debian and happy so far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bekanosky</title>
		<link>http://www.asim.pk/2010/07/23/nordicvps-benchmark/comment-page-1/#comment-882</link>
		<dc:creator>bekanosky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 21:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asim.pk/?p=716#comment-882</guid>
		<description>About RAID, sorry, i&#039;m wrong, i don&#039;t have enough fact </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About RAID, sorry, i&#039;m wrong, i don&#039;t have enough fact</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Asim Zeeshan</title>
		<link>http://www.asim.pk/2010/07/23/nordicvps-benchmark/comment-page-1/#comment-881</link>
		<dc:creator>Asim Zeeshan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 18:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asim.pk/?p=716#comment-881</guid>
		<description>Really? is that so? I never inquired about their RAID HDD arrays. 
 
Ubuntu 10.04 LTS out of box installation was eating more than 170mb of RAM, created support ticket but at the end I was told to use CentOS instead. Unacceptable so I cancelled today. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really? is that so? I never inquired about their RAID HDD arrays. </p>
<p>Ubuntu 10.04 LTS out of box installation was eating more than 170mb of RAM, created support ticket but at the end I was told to use CentOS instead. Unacceptable so I cancelled today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bekanosky</title>
		<link>http://www.asim.pk/2010/07/23/nordicvps-benchmark/comment-page-1/#comment-879</link>
		<dc:creator>bekanosky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 19:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asim.pk/?p=716#comment-879</guid>
		<description>Very similat with my result : http://en.seputarvps.info/blog/benchmark-result-after-using-own-kernel-pygrub/
Unfortunately, it looks like they don&#039;t give RAID HDD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very similat with my result : <a href="http://en.seputarvps.info/blog/benchmark-result-after-using-own-kernel-pygrub/" >http://en.seputarvps.info/blog/benchmark-result-after-using-own-kernel-pygrub/</a><br />
Unfortunately, it looks like they don&#8217;t give RAID HDD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

